TikTok: Social media platform set for US ban after Congress vote

There are fears in many Western countries that the hugely popular social media platform could threaten national security, claims TikTok’s parent ByteDance has denied.

TikTok is banned from Government devices in Australia.

An analyst has said that ByteDance and Beijing “should have read the political signals,” and sold TikTok in the US years ago to prevent the current outcome.

The legislation still has to pass the Senate but US President Joe Biden has said he is prepared to sign a bill into law if both houses of Congress give it the green light.
Beijing has already warned the US that any ban on TikTok would amount to “bullying” and would “come back to bite the United States itself”.

Decisive vote

On Wednesday, US time, the lower house of Congress voted 352 to 65 in favour of the “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act”.

The bill padded decisively and was a rare moment of bipartisanship in a divided Congress.

This would ban TikTok from US app stores unless its American operations were separated from its Chinese owner ByteDance.

The legislation is the biggest threat yet to the video-sharing app, which has surged to huge popularity across the world all while causing intense nervousness among governments and security officials about its Chinese ownership and its potential subservience to the Communist Party in Beijing.

But the fate of the bill is uncertain in the Senate, where key figures are against making such a drastic move against an intensely popular app that has 170 million US users.

‘Make no one happy’

The law would also give the President power to designate other applications to be a national security threat if under the control of a country considered adversarial to the US.

The resurgent campaign by Washington against TikTok came as a surprise to the company, the Wall Street Journal reported, with TikTok executives reassured when Mr Biden joined the app last month as part of his campaign for a second term.

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew is in Washington, trying to shore up support to stop the bill.

“This latest legislation being rushed through at unprecedented speed without even the benefit of a public hearing, poses serious Constitutional concerns,” wrote Michael Beckerman, TikTok’s vice president for public policy, in a letter to the bill’s co-sponsors seen by AFP.

But talking to CNN, deputy director of New York University’s Stern Center for Business and Human Rights Paul Barrett said the firm as well as Beijing should have realised a ban was likely.

“Faced with persistent bipartisan suspicion in the US, ByteDance and the Chinese government should have read the political signals more astutely and spun off TikTok as a stand-alone American company.”

Nut, Mr Barrett warned, a total ban of TikTok in the US would limit free speech and “make no one happy”.

‘Never found evidence’

The co-sponsors, House Republican Mike Gallagher and House Democrat Raja Krishnamoorthi, as well as the White House, argue that the bill is not a ban of TikTok, as long as the company divests from ByteDance.

TikTok is already banned in India while numerous countries – including Australia, New Zealand and the UK – have banned it from government devices.

China fury

China warned on Wednesday that the move would “inevitably come back to bite the United States”.

“Although the United States has never found evidence that TikTok threatens US national security, it has not stopped suppressing TikTok,” foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said, condemning it as “bullying behaviour”.

In a turnaround from his earlier stance, former president Donald Trump on Monday said he is against a ban, mainly because it would strengthen Meta, the owner of Instagram and Facebook, which he called an “enemy of the people.”

When Mr Trump was president, he attempted to wrest control of TikTok from ByteDance, but was blocked by US courts.

Mr Trump denied accusations that he changed his tune because a major investor in TikTok, hedge funder Jeff Yass, is donating to his campaign.

Other efforts to ban TikTok also failed with a bill proposed a year ago getting nowhere largely over free speech concerns.

Similarly, a state law passed in Montana banning the platform was suspended by a federal court on the suspicion that it likely violated constitutional free speech rights.

TikTok staunchly denies any ties to the Chinese government and has restructured the company so the data of US users stays in the country, the company says.